Comments on: Signatures

[rich_505]

Originally Posted by Lucybird

Apple I think, it's standard on mac computers anyway

Thats correct, its the standard browser from Apple and is a component of OS X I do believe. Although Microsoft have released a version of Internet Explorer for OS X

[IC_Thestrals]

What is "glowing" text? I always thought it was the bold text but I am on firefox so it has occured to me I might not really be seeing it.

Merci beaucoup Puchula!

[Puchula]

Originally Posted by IC_Thestrals

What is "glowing" text? I always thought it was the bold text but I am on firefox so it has occured to me I might not really be seeing it.

Merci beaucoup Puchula!

It lookes like this: .

You're welcome.

[rich_505]

Originally Posted by IC_Thestrals

What is "glowing" text? I always thought it was the bold text but I am on firefox so it has occured to me I might not really be seeing it.

Merci beaucoup Puchula!

It is text that has a coloured "glow" of your choice around it, looks quite cool but I find it hard to read

[Lucybird]

I wondered considering the restrictions on horcruxes in signatures am I allowed a picture of a known horcrux (the ring)?

[SiriusBlack22]

Originally Posted by Lucybird

I wondered considering the restrictions on horcruxes in signatures am I allowed a picture of a known horcrux (the ring)?

Since the spoiler policy has expired, I don't see why not. I'm sure that everyone here knows that the ring is a horcrux, if that's what you are worrying about.

[IC_Thestrals]

Originally Posted by SiriusBlack22

Since the spoiler policy has expired, I don't see why not. I'm sure that everyone here knows that the ring is a horcrux, if that's what you are worrying about.

I think she is worried about the horcrux wars. I don't have an answer personally but I would ask a prefect as it seems to be a touchy subject (horcruxes in general).


Once again, thanks puchula! It hurts my eyes so there is no way I am ditching Firefox for that insanity. Just gives me one more reason to like Firefox, no nightmarish texts!

[Jessica]

References to horcruxes are fine. References to Horcrux Clubs are not fine.

[off-topic] OMG! I love your puppy IC Thestrals [/off-topic]

[IC_Thestrals]

Originally Posted by Jessica

References to horcruxes are fine. References to Horcrux Clubs are not fine.

[off-topic] OMG! I love your puppy IC Thestrals [/off-topic]

Thank you for clearing that up about the horcruxes. It was a little confusing and I didn't even know about it till I got back but that is good to know.

[OT] thank you I like yours too![/OT]

[DarkDaysAhead]

Originally Posted by rotsiepots

No Horcrux cliques at CoS, even if they're off site.

Alright, thanks for the reply though.

[Puchula]

Originally Posted by IC_Thestrals

Once again, thanks puchula! It hurts my eyes so there is no way I am ditching Firefox for that insanity. Just gives me one more reason to like Firefox, no nightmarish texts!

If you want to be sure you can't see it read the signature right avobe me. The last two lines (For the sake of those whom I should...) have a pink glow.

Originally Posted by Jessica

[off-topic] OMG! I love your puppy IC Thestrals [/off-topic]

Now you're using the Winzengamot to recruit people for the dog vs. cat war? I'll have to call Benzo to keep you under control.

[QuIdDiTcHRuLz]

How would i put a picture that is saved in paint on my computer into my signature?

Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this...

[vapormist]

There is a tutorial on how to put an image into your signature in the first post of this thread made by Lanifiel.

[QuIdDiTcHRuLz]

Thanks!

[Madeline]

I have a question about the size of an image in your sig- literally.

I know that it has to be no larger than 300 x 300 but there seems to be a difference in the size of my 300 x 300 sig compared to many others. I'd like my pic to be larger, but I don't know how to do that. Does it depend on what you use to resize it?

[Nicole]

Originally Posted by Madeline

my 300 x 300 sig

Your sig pic is showing 100x76, was it bigger when you uploaded it? That would be very odd. Shouldn't matter what program is used to size it, but it should be sized before uploading...

[Madeline]

Originally Posted by Nicole

Your sig pic is showing 100x76, was it bigger when you uploaded it? That would be very odd. Shouldn't matter what program is used to size it, but it should be sized before uploading...

I don't get those dimensions from the same pic on my computer- I get 286 x 216.

[Nicole]

Originally Posted by Madeline

I don't get those dimensions from the same pic on my computer- I get 286 x 216.

That's weird. (I haven't had this particular difficulty...) I wish I could be more help, and very sorry that I don't know the answer...but it's been a 65% reduction in both dimensions.

[Madeline]

Originally Posted by Nicole

That's weird. (I haven't had this particular difficulty...) I wish I could be more help, and very sorry that I don't know the answer...but it's been a 65% reduction in both dimensions.

I think it is being uploaded at a different size. Just for fun I tried to upload the normal sized image to see what would happen (800 x 600) and still got saved as 100 x 76

[Pinkerton]

Originally Posted by Madeline

I think it is being uploaded at a different size. Just for fun I tried to upload the normal sized image to see what would happen (800 x 600) and still got saved as 100 x 76

When you uploaded it for fun did you still use the CoS image host or somewhere else? You could try to upload the originally intended size somewhere like Photobucket and see if you still get those strange results.